$200 Billion Bail-out and Spitzer Charges Intimately Linked

View previous topic View next topic Go down

$200 Billion Bail-out and Spitzer Charges Intimately Linked

Post  4dbob on Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:24 am

Now I don't know how this is going to help, but I think it's good to know what's happening "behind" the story as much as possible. Here's an example.

This week, Bernanke’s Fed, for the first time in its history, loaned a selected coterie of banks one-fifth of a trillion dollars to guarantee these banks’ mortgage-backed junk bonds. The deluge of public loot was an eye-popping windfall to the very banking predators who have brought two million families to the brink of foreclosure.

Up until Wednesday, there was one single, lonely politician who stood in the way of this creepy little assignation at the bankers’ bordello: Eliot Spitzer.


Check out Greg Palast's insightful take on the mess:

In Palast's words, ‘Steering,’ sub-prime loans, fake inducements to over-borrow, ‘fraudulent conveyance’ or ‘predatory lending’ under US law, were almost completely forbidden in the olden days (Clinton Administration and earlier) by federal regulators and state laws as nothing more than fancy loan-sharking. However, when the Bush regime took over, Countrywide and its banking brethren were told to party hearty – it was OK now to steer’m, fake’m, charge’m and take’m.

But there was this annoying party-pooper. The Attorney General of New York, Eliot Spitzer, who sued these guys to a fare-thee-well. Or tried to. Bush intervened, ordering states to ignore their own consumer protection laws.

Flashforward to the bubble-bursting. Angry regulators, burned investors and the weight of millions of homes about to be boarded up were causing the sharks to sink. Countrywide’s stock was down 50%, and Citigroup was off 38%, not pleasing to the Gulf sheiks who now control its biggest share blocks.

Then, on Wednesday of this week, the unthinkable happened. Carlyle Capital went bankrupt. Who? That’s Carlyle as in Carlyle Group. James Baker, Senior Counsel. Notable partners, former and past: George Bush, the Bin Laden family and more dictators, potentates, pirates and presidents than you can count.

The Fed had to act. Bernanke opened the vault and dumped $200 billion on the poor little suffering bankers. They got the public treasure – and got to keep the houses. There was no ‘quid’ of a foreclosure moratorium for the ‘pro quo’ of public bailout. Not one family was saved – but not one banker was left behind.

Every mortgage sharking operation shot up in value. Mozilo’s Countrywide stock rose 17% in one day. The Citi sheiks saw their company’s stock rise $10 billion in an afternoon.

And that very same day the bail-out was decided – what a coinkydink! – the man called, ‘The Sheriff of Wall Street’ was cuffed. Spitzer was silenced.

It was the night of February 13 when Spitzer made the bone-headed choice to order take-out in his Washington Hotel room. He had just finished signing these words for the Washington Post about predatory loans:

“Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.”

Bush, Spitzer said right in the headline, was the “Predator Lenders’ Partner in Crime.” The President, said Spitzer, was a fugitive from justice. And Spitzer was in Washington to launch a campaign to take on the Bush regime and the biggest financial powers on the planet.

And now you know "the rest of the story"...

bOB

4dbob
Contributor
Contributor

Posts: 5
Join date: 2008-03-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

International bankers

Post  Ben Garrison on Sat May 10, 2008 7:52 am

Isn't it funny how Americans have come to accept and even applaud the Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a reserve and really nothing more than a private bank) for taking control of our money and charging us interest for the privilege?

Now the Fed is bailing out other private international banks with OUR money. When these banks make money, the money is theirs. If they lose money, U.S. taxpayers are their safety net. It amounts to a hidden tax we must pay for banks with NO allegiance to the country. We can't even know who controls or owns the banks although we have a good idea. New World Order ring any bells?

---
The US Federal Reserve is now underwriting, i.e. subsidizing, the commercial activities of global private investment banks. The 20 primary dealers in US government bonds include the world’s largest investment banks - BNP Paribas Securities Corp. (French), Barclays Capital Inc (British), Banc of America Securities LLC (USA), UBS Securities LLC (Swiss), Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein Securities LLC (German), Daiwa Securities US Inc. (Japan) etc.

In truth, these investment banks are global entities and have no actual nationality no matter what jurisdiction in which they are legally domiciled. As such, they also have no allegiance except to their own self-interests.

QUESTION:

Why is the US government allocating public resources for the benefit of private international investment banks?

ANSWER:

US resources are subsidizing international investment banks through the Federal Reserve Bank, a quasi private entity which was given governmental powers in 1913 (some allege in violation of the US Constitution). That a quasi private bank is bailing out private banks with public monies does make sense. What doesn’t make sense is why the public allows it.

http://www.kitco.com/ind/schoon/may052008.html javascript:emoticonp('Sad')

Ben Garrison
Contributor
Contributor

Posts: 5
Join date: 2008-03-03
Age: 53
Location: Lynnwood

View user profile http://bengarrison.com

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum